Saturday, February 20, 2010

Humble Tips for Fellow Garden Beginners

After having unusually cold and snowy weather for a while, we broke out into an unusually warm and sunny weekend! I understand that a recent Tom Friedman column in the New York Times spoke of "Global Weirding" and I think he's right!

Winter really does feel like a creeping, quiet hibernation time when one is both a) a southerner who looks at the first snowfall each year and thinks to himself, "Huh...I wonder just what is this stuff??" and b) a day-dreaming newbie gardener almost ready to rip up the whole lawn and homestead his heart out. So today I got out and made the most of this break before the temperatures drop down a bit again in the coming days. It was long and hard work, but by the late afternoon I could sit my tired self down and celebrate a new garden bed running down the gentle south slope from our largest oak tree. Part of this evening was spent in devotions with a nursery catalogue, selecting candidates for the latest mini-ecosystem at our house.

This is now my fifth straight season of gardening and the third in the current residence. I have no doubt that I am still quite the beginner in this experience. But this has been enough time of reading and practice for me to learn a few things along the way that may be worth sharing, especially for friends who have also started to take up gardening as practice or at least as hypothesis. Maybe you know all this already or maybe this will be helpful. Either way, I'm going to keep typing.

1. You will not achieve your miracle garden overflowing with luscious vegetables, all-season long, in the first season. In fact, I haven't achieved anything close to that yet. Developing a good garden takes time, especially if you make the effort to pursue ecological harmony instead of the "easy" way out of Miracle Gro, fertilizer and pesticide. Gardening is perhaps ultimately about reaching a genuine sense of place so that your little hamlet of the natural world becomes "home" in a very true sense. You get to the good garden because you know your soil, your climate, your critters, your sun and your shade. And you don't know all of these things your first season, or your second. Moreover, just when you think you know them, something new is added to the mix. Creation is always flowing in the flux that the good Lord intended, so you can't become complacent. Observation is critical, and I should know because I'm not good at it. But once you have good knowledge of your garden place, both empirical and intuitive, then you have the baseline that helps you adjust readily to ever-changing circumstances.

Plus, good gardens create communities of plants (not zombiefied monocultures like on agribusiness farms) and it takes time to know what communities work each year (for annuals) or to establish strong communities year-over-year (for perennials). Sometimes you really just have to grow into a good garden. Again, I'm not there yet!

2. With good planning and principles in hand, a lot of the hard work comes up front but tapers off after that. This at least is true if one is trying to garden according to the permaculture ideal. In other words, it's back-breaking labor first to build those garden beds, plant those fruit trees, and so on. But once a pretty good garden has been established then it's supposed to be a matter of letting nature doing most of the work and then cooperating with that. If good soil has been formed, plants have been placed well, birds and bees and butterflies are showing up, and there's no severe drought, then you can have less of the hard labor and more of the sheer enjoyment. But this means ignoring a lot of "conventional" gardening - i.e., organizing plants in rows and tilling the soil each year. You'll find out that not only is this way of doing things ecologically irresponsible, it's also very tiring.

3. Don't get ambitious about feeding yourself and your family with your vegetable garden and expect to have other enjoyments or a job. Besides, self-sufficiency isn't a Christian virtue. Go the farmer's market or co-op grocery. Sign up for a share with a local CSA. I think a best practice is to look at your diet, look at what local farmers offer, and think about planting the missing ingredients, if possible. Don't think that your garden is the lifeline to survival if you lose your job, get slapped with heavy medical bills, or Western civilization collapses. A stable, sustainable garden will certainly help your resilience. But it won't keep you alive - especially if you don't have the space to grow the protein-rich stuff like grains or lots of potatoes. I should know - I have a lot that's nearly half an acre and, based on reading my copy of Small-Scale Grain Raising, we'd probably need to turn just about every inch of sunny lawn over to grain to have, in potential, enough survival bread for a good chunk of the year.

4. If you're serious about a resilient, sustainable vegetable garden, don't buy the super-cheap seed packets at the box stores. Suppose you wanted to save the seeds from your bell pepper you got at Lowe's and plant them next year? Good luck with that one. Almost all the seeds in the stores are hybrids and so their descendants will not return "true to type" but start deviating into unpredicable varieties from which they were bred, which will span the range of edibility (or lack thereof). If you want to save seeds, buy heirloom varieties from places like Seed Savers Exchange. You'll be promoting biodiversity and preserving all kinds of endangered tastes and colors that have been pushed aside by agribusiness uniformity. And you can do this at the same time as you save yourself money and enhance your resilience - who knew? Keep in mind, though, that you need to either plant a LOT of a variety to keep the gene pool broad and healthy, or get involved in the actual exchanging part of groups like SSE.

5. Compost, compost, compost. It's the miracle drug of gardening. Don't even think of skimping on this part. And upgrade to composting with worms! I haven't done this yet, but everything tells me I need to get on board soon so my plants can get a really super hit of the good stuff.

6. Don't make the garden just about you. As suggested above, the birds, bees and butterflies are your friends. Birds eat bugs, especially a lot of the ones you don't want around. Bees and butterflies make a lot of plant sex happen, which will be good if you're planting heirloom varieties and want to save seed. So be sure to build so-called "ornamental" beds, or beds that mix food crops and those with other purposes. Get plants that flower, bear fruit that you may care little about eating, or that are known for generating seed that birds love.

7. Go native! A lot of the plants that are even at your friendly, local garden center are exotic species that may look pretty but are not best suited for your region. They may be poisonous to certain animals or invasive species that destabilize natural habitats. Or they may just need more attention to grow well in places foreign to their evolved dispositions. Even non-native species that serve some useful purposes are out-done by the home team. For example, we bought a butterfly bush last year to do you can guess what. But the butterfly bush, while pretty and helpful in attracting butterflies to feed, has a distinct limitation. Butterflies here in the eastern US will not lay their eggs on the butterfly bush. But there are pretty, native plants that offer food and suitable circumstances for hatching and larval development. Why settle for less?

8. Don't ignore your garden in August because it's hot. This brings us full circle back to number one. Don't stop thinking about your garden in January either. It is a practice of constant observation, reflection and action. Make this a year-round commitment or just stick to growing a potted tomato plant on your porch each summer.

For what it's worthy, these are my thoughts on what fellow beginners should know as they set out. Feel free to share what you think are other important bits of advice.

Labels: ,

Saturday, January 09, 2010

Getting to Know the Neighbors

By that I do not mean my human neighbors. Two of the three houses next to ours are empty, which leaves a certain impediment in that quest. Our own property claims always overlap with the homes and territories defined across different lengths and dimensions by the animals who share our space. Our birdfeeders have given us the most rewarding opportunity to discover some of the winged community members whose daily living mingles alongside ours.

I have always been something of a fan of the Northern Cardinal. The bright red plumage of the male is always lovely to behold and looks especially impressive against a snowy background such as we have experienced on a couple of occasions this winter. Cardinals also tend to form bonded pairs. So two of our neighbors are a male and female Cardinal couple who never stray too far from one another. One may venture away about hundred feet or so but it often isn't long before the other arrives on the scene as well. And when they are separated they seem insistent on keeping contact. Just the other day when I was leaving the house after lunch I saw the female repeating short, single chirps from a tree at the house next to our driveway. The male echoed each chirp from an evergreen tree at the abandoned house across the street. But more often than not I see them hiding together in the ample bush near our seed feeder.

Our other known neighbor is a male Red-Bellied Woodpecker, which is kind of a dumb name since the distinctive red mark is on their heads. He's a much bigger, noisier fellow with a loner personality and a territorial zeal. Whether by intent or sheer frightening size he scares the other birds away from the feeders in a hurry. He comes to both feeders but prefers the suet hanging from the oak tree out front. I feel like he deserves a name but I haven't decided on a fitting one for him yet. Any suggestions?


Labels: , ,

Monday, November 02, 2009

Chick tract parody

The Cthulhu mythos of H.P. Lovecraft is a rather twisted collection of horror writing. It's hard to imagine that atheistic nihilism could be topped, but it has....by ancient, capricious monster-deity nihilism! If you don't know anything about Lovecraft or the mythos, go look it up on wikipedia. Then read this parody of the Jack Chick tracts based on it and enjoy. Nihilism has never been so funny.



Click on the image to begin.






Labels:

Friday, October 02, 2009

Astronomy's Big Year

I have been more interested lately in matters pertaining to the relationship of science and theology and I've finally started to do some reading in that regard. While this interest arose prior to my first study session at IBTS in Prague, my readings have nevertheless been stimulated by the course module given under the direction of Dr. Nancey Murphy, a Christian philosopher out of Fuller who focuses on issues relating to science. My current resource for reflection, which I have owned for some time but only just now started to examine, is The Sacred Cosmos: Christian Faith and the Challenge of Naturalism by the Thomist theologian Terence Nichols. Other interesting works have included Back to Darwin: A Richer Account of Evolution, edited by John B. Cobb, Jr., and Nancey Murphy's Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism.

On a broader intellectual level, meanwhile, my attention to matters scientific has, at least for the time being, emerged from a state of relative dormancy since childhood. And it seems an auspicious year to engage science - both generally as well as in relationship to the theological enterprise. 2009 marks the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of his publication of On the Origin of Species (on my birthday, no less!). Moreover, we Baptists aren't the only ones celebrating four hundred years. While John Smyth was rediscovering believers' baptism Galileo Galilei was tinkering with a new device called the telescope. He improved the magnification of this Dutch invention up to 30x and became the first person to dedicate its use to studying the heavens. In January 1610 Galileo discovered the four largest moons of Jupiter now called the "Galilean satellites." These were the first celestial objects not visible to the naked eye ever found, and his observations of their motion helped bring down the longstanding geocentric cosmology.

Odds are you aren't aware of this, and indeed I was late to the party, but the International Astronomical Union, the same group that voted Pluto out of the planetary club, has declared this anniversary to be the "International Year of Astronomy." The IAU's goals are what one would expect: increased science education centered on astronomy, public observing sessions or "star parties" that bring more people to the telescope eyepiece, and initiatives to combat light pollution's encroachment on dark skies.

I must say that I'm easily drawn into the celebration. I've always enjoyed the "big picture" perspective found in contemplating the vast scale and complexity of this universe God has made. Photographs of distant galaxies and nebulae are simply stunning and beautiful to behold. But beyond the Discovery Channel documentaries and the armchair stargazing, I think looking through the binoculars and the telescope to catch light from incomprehensible distances is a rewarding experience. On top of that, astronomy is one of the few sciences where amateurs can still make fairly significant contributions such as discovering and tracking asteroids and comets.

So I've been more intentionally rediscovering amateur astronomy over the past several weeks. I've wanted a telescope, off and on, for some time now. But while that has been put on my Christmas list, I've gone ahead and purchased a cheap pair of binoculars to begin familiarizing myself with the sky above and making "discoveries" of various objects.

How can one get more familiar with what's going on in astronomy, or learn about possibly taking it up as a hobby? Perhaps a good place to start would be listening to some podcasts, such as the 365 Days of Astronomy, a specifically IYA project, or the appropriately-named Astronomy Cast. Armchair stargazing knows no better place on the web than Astronomy Picture of the Day. Google, unsurprisingly, has taken things to the next level with the "Sky" feature of Google Earth that lets you fly around the night sky in an adventure of wasting time that far exceeds chasing a chain of Wikipedia links.

If you want to learn more about what it takes to get into amateur astronomy, and what one might expect, than one of the most informative locations will be the web site for Sky & Telescope magazine. But the best thing to do, so everyone says, is to see if you can find a local astronomy club near you and make a visit to one of their observing sessions. Don't drop the big ones until you have a sense for what it's like!

Or maybe the best thing to do is just drive out to the middle of nowhere, to a place where one can actually see the Milky Way and a sky littered with stars, then just sit on the hood of your car.

And start singing a hymn.

Labels:

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Test

This is a test. Am I still "blocked" or have the powers that be at Blogspot determined that I am, in fact, a person?

Labels:

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Make an easy start to gardening

Given the comments friends have made to recent posts, I thought I would share from my own experience of getting started in gardening. Living into a biblical agrarian practice doesn't require 40 acres and a mule. It might not require leaving a developed area at all. In fact, from the theological end of things, Ellen Davis intends in her final chapter, "The Faithful City," to tease out an Old Testament view of city-country mutuality. From the practical end of things, one may consider perusing Path to Freedom, the online account of one urban household (in Pasadena, of all places), that produces up to 6,000 pounds of food each year from a 1/5 acre lot. That certainly got me wondering about my comparatively extensive .42 acre property!

I account this coming spring as Garden 4.0. My first attempt, in Spring 2007, sprang out of a zeal not according to knowledge. Having read hardly anything about gardening, I simply worked in some Miracle Grow into a patch of soil in a fenced-off area of the back yard (to protect it from my roommates' dogs) and planted herbs. Several sprang up...but then the dogs made their way into that space and trampled pretty much everything. What was left died a slow, hot death under drought conditions while I worked at Koinonia Farm. In Spring 2008, the dogs were gone, and I used cinder blocks for miniature raised beds in which I planted lettuce. Again, I used a soil-Miracle Grow mix. Some of the lettuce endured my neglect as I turned to finishing school and getting married, and even lasted into the summer. Very little was harvested, however.

Finally, with space and relatively free weekends, I established my first bed in the summer and planted onion, parsley, chives, okra, corn, pepper, mint, and a tomato plant. The garden started strong but several varieties succumbed to disease or pests. I got the strongest showing from the herbs and green onion tops. I currently have some lettuce that I have a faint hope will overwinter, but otherwise the garden is bare.

Both I and Craig, my generally silent partner on this blog (grin), garden according to the very easy, perfect-for-beginners "Square Foot" method. You don't have to know much anything about gardening and you don't need a lot of tools to get started this way. I can tell you that SFG is one form of a family of intensive-raised bed gardening methods, but you don't even need to know that, either! You do want to know its advantages:

  • You can locate the bed pretty much wherever you want as long as it gets enough sun.
  • No digging or tilling of soil required (in the updated version).
  • You get about the same yield for 1/5 the space, which conserves a lot of water.
  • Weeding is much reduced and nearly nonexistent.
  • The book helps you figure out how to plant for a relatively continuous harvest of food.
SFG was started by a retired civil engineer, Mel Bartholomew, a few decades ago. The basic premise: build a frame of whatever size suits you and your needs, measured out by square feet (Mel prefers 4x4 boxes). Tack weed cloth on the underside. Create "Mel's Mix" for your soil (1/3 mixed compost, 1/3 peat moss, 1/3 vermiculite, all available at Lowe's or Home Depot) and fill the box. Plant your seeds and off you go. After you harvest a plant, just spade in a little compost in its place before planting again.


And there are variations on this. You can go to the GardenWeb forum and learn about how different people modify the method and the mix. If you have pretty good soil at your house already, you might just dig it up and mix it with Miracle Grow or compost instead of buying bags of peat moss and vermiculite that will end up being more expensive.

There are two disadvantages I can see to starting with SFG. They don't outweigh its ease of use that can welcome anyone into gardening, but they should be kept in mind for the future. First, Mel's book doesn't have any real insight about organic responses to pests and disease. You'll need to get your hand on other resources for that. Second, giving your bed a "floor" such as weed cloth (or even wood for portable beds that Mel mentions) prevents your garden's full participation in the ecology of its place. SFG is organic and environmentally-friendly...with the one great exception that your garden will not contribute to the building up of a rich, healthy soil structure. Consider learning about other raised bed methods (see here and here) and applying that information in the future. Also, invest in a couple of other gardening books. Here are the ones I currently own and read:

Four Season Harvest: Organic Vegetables from your Home Garden All Year Long

Gardening When it Counts: Growing Food in Hard Times

Seed to Seed: Seed Saving and Growing Techniques for Vegetable Gardeners

My plan this spring is to continue SFG essentially as is with perhaps four 4x4 beds in the yard, to be supplemented with some trellis crops along the south-facing wall of the house and some shade-friendly plants in a small, soil-bound bed along the north wall.

Oh, and you can teach yourself some of the broad context for sustainable food production with the Internet program Agroinnovations. No digging required for this one, either.

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 01, 2007

What might have been?

This I didn't know before...

*****

I'm quite a fan of soccer and I always enjoy the World Cup as it comes around every four years. I wouldn't mind one day living in or near a city with an MLS team and supporting it. I had known that the MLS is the successor to the defunct North American Soccer League, which crashed and burned in 1984. The vociferous critics of soccer in America say it crashed and burned because it simply isn't this country's sport. I don't think that has to be the case, and apparently it wasn't merely a failure of popularity in a free market of sports that caused the NASL's demise. Consider this from Parnesh Sharma's opinion piece at The Christian Science Monitor:

In its heyday in the late 1970s, the NASL was a serious presence on the US sports scene. The New York Cosmos, the league's flagship franchise, had little trouble filling Giants Stadium, especially when soccer legend Pele joined the team. The NFL, then not quite the juggernaut it is today, watched this development warily. Aided by a willing media, it began to vilify US soccer.

The media portrayed soccer players as foreign invaders, calling them "commie pansies." Soccer was derided as something for immigrants. Fearful of being perceived as un-American, many immigrants disavowed soccer – the pastime of their homelands – and embraced US sports.

In addition to applying pressure to newspapers, radio and television stations, and advertisers, the NFL also prohibited its owners from owning teams in other sports (an action directed chiefly against the NASL). The NASL sued, but the NFL won in court in 1982. The NASL folded in 1984.

*****

Today, however, the MLS is picking up steam, and multiple ownership is allowed by the NFL. More Americans follow the World Cup and sponsorship is up. Ignore the derision of the isolationists, and viva la real football!

Labels:

Friday, May 04, 2007

When good music comes to town...

On Monday night the Lincoln Theatre in downtown Raleigh hosted the one and only Derek Webb, a former vocalist and songwriter for Caedmon's Call who has been going solo for a few years and about 5 or 6 albums. Often introspective and sometimes irascible, Derek has increasingly made it his (at least implicit) goal to shock and provoke his fellow Christians to rethink their understanding of themselves, the Church, politics, etc. Derek gained some measure of notoriety on his first album with what has become by far his most well-known (and arguably most loved) post-Caedmon's song, Wedding Dress. Derek does not shy away from fairly graphic language to contrast the faithful love of God with the fickle response of the Christian:

'Cause I am a whore I do confess
But I put you on just like a wedding dress
And I run down the aisle, run down the aisle
I'm a prodigal with no way home
But I put you on just like a ring of gold
And I run down the aisle, run down the aisle
to you.


Derek begins one verse of the song with the words, "So could you love this bastard child?"

The harsh language upset some Christian retailers, but Derek upped the ante against his own evangelical subculture on the album I See Things Upside Down when, in one song, he took his cue from the Song of Solomon and wrote "better than wine is your love" and used the image of drunkenness to describe love.

As if Derek hadn't done enough for some people to pull his albums off the shelves, after coming here to Duke Divinity School to do a concert he was introduced to the theological work of Stanley Hauerwas. Now I'm not sure of all the details of the story or whether Derek's thoughts were moving in a certain direction beforehand, but the influence of Hauerwas was apparently enough to get Derek to take a firm stand in favor of Christian pacifism. Last year he came out with the album Mockingbird, which is at the same time vicious and beautiful, compelling and, for some, exacerbating. Derek pummels the standard consensus thinking of theologically and politically "conservative" evangelicals as he assaults the morality of war, the death penalty, and the status quo that allows some Christians to ignore socioeconomic differences by focusing on the less challenging mission of "soul-winning." Most will focus on the second verse of the song A King and a Kingdom as illustrative of Derek's forcefulness:

there are two great lies that i’ve heard:
“the day you eat of the fruit of that tree, you will not surely die”
and that Jesus Christ was a white, middle-class republican
and if you wanna be saved you have to learn to be like Him

Various concertgoers have reported people walking out in disgust over Derek's lyrics. Now from time to time he has changed the wording to "middle-class Democrat" in an attempt to demonstrate he has not traded in one set of political idolatries for another. Nevertheless because of the tone of his writing many evangelicals will likely not consider what Derek has to say and continue to write him off as just some sort of leftist.

Derek's new album The Ringing Bell is not as (overtly) politically charged as the last one, although it still has some stinging critiques in songs such as A Savior on Capitol Hill. A couple of the songs appear to be semi-veiled responses to the critical voices that have assaulted his work, while one, I Don't Want to Fight, is an appeal for peaceful dialogue over differences that he himself is surely still learning. Derek argues for his pacifism more subtly, and perhaps in the end that may be more influential.

Well, I've been tracing the history of Derek Webb's music and I've said nothing about the concert. In short, it was phenomenal. Derek played a range of his songs from Caedmon's days through the new album. He was supported by a full band and three special guests - his 7-months-pregnant wife Sandra McCracken on keyboard and vocals, producer/musician Cason Cooley on bass guitar, and current Caedmon's member and fellow solo artist Andrew Osenga on guitar and vocals. Andrew and Cason were both members of a phenomenal, and largely ignored, band called The Normals. Cason now focuses on producing while Andrew plays with Caedmon's and also produces his own well-written, largely introspective albums. Andrew remains one of my favorite artists and I would love to get him to do a concert at the Divinity School.

Despite all my talk about Derek Webb, I'm going to end with a YouTube clip from the concert of Andrew playing Early in the Morning off his latest album. I would post it on the site, but I haven't quite figured out how to do that yet. So just follow the link. Go to YouTube and enjoy!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cSmOqZttZxQ

Labels:

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Chambourcin-sational!

With company in town for spring break, Kelly and I decided to take them on a tour of some wineries here in central North Carolina. The state has seen a burgeoning wine industry in recent years, with the number of licensed vineyards jumping from 27 three years ago to 63 at this point in time. The winemakers have grown in sophistication as well as numbers, and they have begun to win awards not just in state festivals but also regional and international competitions. At the same time, meanwhile, they remain small enough and sparse enough that they do not serve up the pretentiousness of Napa Valley along with their fermented grapes. The wineries we visited had a rather comfortable, homey feel. While justifiably proud of their work, they do not set themselves up like Persian palaces - although I still bought my most expensive bottle of wine from Darioush, because it is the most amazing Cabernet Sauvignon I've ever tasted.

North Carolina now ranks somewhere between 10th and 12th among the states in total wine production, having just recently passed Colorado. Of course, it's paltry 2,000 acres runs far below California's 400,000, but nevertheless it is a significant and exciting new development in the post-tobacco economy here. The state even has its own designated wine region, the Yadkin Valley area, although vineyards can be found everywhere from the Blue Ridge to the coast. The wineries we visited are not that far west, but five of them are in such proximity that they can constitute a wine trail. They are offer certain cultural opportunities that enhance leisurely enjoyment in the area, from dancing to outdoor concerts to artists' festivals.

One aspect that makes North Carolina winemaking exciting is the possibility of a distinctive regional wine emerging. A number of the vineyards are now growing a French/American hybrid grape known as Chambourcin, which was first produced in the 1960s. This varietal has been used for some time as an ingredient in European wine blends but has not until recently been tried as a wine in its own right. However, because the Chambourcin grape grows really well in humid climates (and therefore not in California), it has become a favored choice in this state. It is also favored because while it has an assertive flavor, it is not so robust as a Cabernet or Merlot and so it is more attractive or easier to drink for people who are not used to red wine - and that certainly includes people in the Southeastern United States, who often either drink nothing alcoholic at all or otherwise drink beer and homemade moonshine and "white lightning." Nevertheless, Chambourcin remains appealing to established wine-drinkers such as myself.

The wineries here are also producing tasty Cabernets, Merlots, and Chardonnays, along with more typically Eastern varietals such as Muscadine and Scuppernong and less conventional wines such as Blackberry and Pomegranate. There's plenty to choose from and plenty to enjoy, so if you drop in to visit I know where to take you.

Labels: